TAP reading note: Conceptualizing a resilience research framework at The National Institutes of Health

What the study found

Presents a shared NIH resilience framework linking a specified system and challenge to responses over time. Resistance, adaptation, recovery and growth are possible outcomes to investigate.

Scope & limitations

Cross-domain conceptual framework; no single participant sample.

A research-organizing framework, not an endorsed personal score or evidence that any intervention improves resilience.

Population & sample

Concept development drawing on work across NIH Institutes, Centers and Offices.

Exposure or intervention

Systems, challenges, protective factors and the observation of responses.

Outcomes

Resilience definitions and research-design considerations across domains.

Time frame

Depends on the defined challenge and system; no universal observation window.

Research funding

No funding conclusion is drawn from the abstract and public NIH framework page.

Research conflicts of interest

No conflict-of-interest conclusion is drawn from those sources.

Reading scope

Publisher abstract and the NIH Resilience Research Working Group’s public framework. We use the framework’s organization, not an intervention effect claim.

References

1. LaVerne Brown, Barbara Cohen, Rebecca Costello, Olga Brazhnik, Zorina Galis (2023). Conceptualizing a resilience research framework at The National Institutes of Health. Stress and Health. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3260

Publication record

TAP-RDN-0033 · v0.1 · English

Scientific review has not been completed for this edition.

The Allostasis Project is founded and supported by Resilio.

© The Allostasis Project. All rights reserved. Reproduction or adaptation requires separate permission, subject to applicable legal exceptions.

Download complete edition record (JSON) ↧