Leaving Work at Work: A Meta-Analysis on Employee Recovery From Work
Laurens Bujold Steed · Brian W. Swider · Sejin Keem · Joseph T. Liu
Journal of Management · 2021
What the research tells us
This meta-analysis separates recovery activities, experiences and states. Their relationships with work demands, resources, well-being and performance differed, showing why one definition cannot simply stand in for the others.
Scope & interpretation
Recovery activities, experiences and states overlap only partly. Pooled associations are limited by study designs; comparisons with other reviews should also identify overlapping samples.
Study at a glance
- POPULATION & SAMPLE
- Meta-analysis using 198 empirical samples across employee-recovery research.
- EXPOSURE / INTERVENTION / SUBJECT
- Recovery conceptualized as activities, experiences or states, and its relationship with demands and resources.
- OUTCOMES
- Well-being and performance; associations differed by the recovery construct measured.
- TIME FRAME
- Studies use different observation windows. Journal volume published in 2021; first online in 2019.
Cited on this site
Editorial & review record
Record for v0.2 · Updated
Editorial responsibility: TAP Editorial Team
Editorial note
Under the editorial responsibility of the TAP Editorial Team, this publication used AI assistance for content organization and editing.
Download detailed editorial record (JSON) ↓
How responsibilities and review are recorded ↗Scope of this reading note
Selected research interpretation based on the original abstract and bibliographic record.
- Funding & competing interests
- Funding and competing-interest details have not been verified against the full text. Consult the original publication’s declarations.
Project support
Founded and supported by Resilio.
Read the editorial standards ↗