2023 International Olympic Committee’s (IOC) consensus statement on Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs)
Margo Mountjoy · Kathryn E. Ackerman · David M. Bailey · Louise M. Burke · Naama Constantini · Anthony C. Hackney · Ida Aliisa Heikura · Anna Melin · Anne Marte Pensgaard · Trent Stellingwerff · Jorunn Kaiander Sundgot-Borgen · Monica Klungland Torstveit · Astrid Uhrenholdt Jacobsen · Evert Verhagen · Richard Budgett · Lars Engebretsen · Uğur Erdener
British Journal of Sports Medicine · 2023
What the research tells us
The framework distinguishes adaptable from problematic low energy availability and considers health and performance together.
Scope & interpretation
A clinical framework, not a diagnostic rule based on one missed meal or a consumer-calculated energy value.
Study at a glance
- POPULATION & SAMPLE
- Consensus concerning female and male athletes.
- EXPOSURE / INTERVENTION / SUBJECT
- Evidence synthesis and expert consensus on REDs.
- OUTCOMES
- Conceptual models, assessment and prevention/treatment principles.
- TIME FRAME
- 2023 consensus; source notes a later correction to Figure 6.
Cited on this site
Editorial & review record
Record for v1.0 · Updated
Editorial responsibility: TAP Editorial Team
Scientific review
Not yet scientifically reviewed
Editorial note
Under the editorial responsibility of the TAP Editorial Team, this publication used AI assistance for content organization and editing. Scientific review is recorded separately on this page.
Download detailed editorial record (JSON) ↓
How responsibilities and review are recorded ↗Scope of this reading note
PubMed abstract and publisher-indexed framework descriptions and funding note; complete competing-interest details require the original declaration.
- Study funding
- Authors declared no specific grant for this research.
- Competing interests
- Not yet verified against the full text.
Project support
Founded and supported by Resilio.
Read the editorial standards ↗