Readiness, recovery, and strain: an evaluation of composite health scores in consumer wearables
Cailbhe Doherty, Maximus Baldwin, Rory Lambe, David Burke and Marco Altini
Translational Exercise Biomedicine · 2025
What the research tells us
Composite scores differed in inputs and calculation approaches, with limited transparency and validation evidence.
Scope & interpretation
A documentation-based review, not an independent trial of every device or subsequent software version.
Study at a glance
- POPULATION & SAMPLE
- 14 composite health scores, 10 manufacturers.
- EXPOSURE / INTERVENTION / SUBJECT
- Publicly described scoring systems and supporting literature.
- OUTCOMES
- Score contributors, methodological transparency and validation evidence.
- TIME FRAME
- Review published in April 2025; systems may subsequently change.
Cited on this site
Editorial & review record
Record for v1.0 · Updated
Editorial responsibility: TAP Editorial Team
Scientific review
Not yet scientifically reviewed
Editorial note
Under the editorial responsibility of the TAP Editorial Team, this publication used AI assistance for content organization and editing. Scientific review is recorded separately on this page.
Download detailed editorial record (JSON) ↓
How responsibilities and review are recorded ↗Scope of this reading note
Publisher abstract, indexed methodology and funding declaration.
- Study funding
- Health Research Board Ireland (HRB ILP-PHR-2024-005) and Research Ireland (12/RC/2289_P2).
- Competing interests
- Competing-interest details have not been verified against the complete publication.
Project support
Founded and supported by Resilio.
Read the editorial standards ↗