TAP reading note: A reporting checklist for human and animal heart rate variability research
The authors propose minimum reporting items for human and animal HRV research: recording conditions, raw signals, windows, respiration, artefacts, frequency bands, nonlinear parameters, software and statistics. Animal work additionally requires species, anaesthesia, temperature and postoperative recovery conditions.
Updated 2026-10-29 · Archived
This is the text and publication record captured for this edition. Later corrections appear in subsequent editions. Website design and interactive software are not archived here.
What the study found
The authors propose minimum reporting items for human and animal HRV research: recording conditions, raw signals, windows, respiration, artefacts, frequency bands, nonlinear parameters, software and statistics. Animal work additionally requires species, anaesthesia, temperature and postoperative recovery conditions.
Scope & limitations
Human and animal HRV methods literature; no new data-analysis sample.
This is a narrative methodological review and author-proposed checklist. The consulted text did not describe Delphi consensus or external validation. Complete reporting improves inspectability but does not itself establish device validity, physiological specificity or useful clinical prediction.
Population & sample
Human and animal HRV methods literature; no new data-analysis sample.
Exposure or intervention
Reporting requirements for human and animal recording and analysis conditions.
Outcomes
Completeness of methodological reporting; no diagnostic or treatment-effect estimate.
Time frame
Depends on short-term, long-term or animal protocols; no common follow-up.
Research funding
Not yet verified against the full text.
Research conflicts of interest
Not yet verified against the full text.
Reading scope
Publisher full text and PDF Tables 2/3, future directions and conclusion. Comparison with other committee guidance and external applications remains outstanding.
References
Publication record
TAP-RDN-0054 · v1.0 · English
Author: TAP Editorial Team ·
The Allostasis Project is founded and supported by Resilio.
Record for v1.0 · Updated
Editorial responsibility: TAP Editorial Team
Scientific review
Not yet scientifically reviewed
Editorial note
Under the editorial responsibility of the TAP Editorial Team, this publication used AI assistance for content organization and editing. Scientific review is recorded separately on this page.
Download detailed editorial record (JSON) ↓
How responsibilities and review are recorded ↗© The Allostasis Project. All rights reserved. Reproduction or adaptation requires separate permission, subject to applicable legal exceptions.
Download complete edition record (JSON) ↧
Record integrity & available editions
SHA-256: 14ae9af31defd17f34fa04fa0f8619fae9a471b7a7fb8a01f196c26e70def2ca
Captured: 2026-10-29T10:31:13.637Z
- v1.0 · 2026-10-29