TAP reading note: Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype
Fried and colleagues define a frailty phenotype using weight loss, exhaustion, weak grip, slow gait and low activity, with three or more criteria indicating frailty. Its associations with later death, hospitalisation and functional decline offer an operational framework for vulnerability in older adults; it does not directly measure dynamic recovery after a stressor.
Updated 2026-10-29 · Archived
This is the text and publication record captured for this edition. Later corrections appear in subsequent editions. Website design and interactive software are not archived here.
What the study found
Fried and colleagues define a frailty phenotype using weight loss, exhaustion, weak grip, slow gait and low activity, with three or more criteria indicating frailty. Its associations with later death, hospitalisation and functional decline offer an operational framework for vulnerability in older adults; it does not directly measure dynamic recovery after a stressor.
Scope & limitations
5,317 community-dwelling CHS adults aged ≥65 in two recruitment cohorts; frailty prevalence was 6.9%.
Observational design, available cohort variables, some self-report and disease exclusions limit generalisation. Table 7 gives a three-year falls HR of 1.29 (95% CI 1.00–1.68), P=.054; not every endpoint was significant. Sex/body-size-specific thresholds require checking before application.
Population & sample
5,317 community-dwelling CHS adults aged ≥65 in two recruitment cohorts; frailty prevalence was 6.9%.
Exposure or intervention
Five phenotype criteria: one or two indicate an intermediate state, three or more frailty, compared with non-frail participants.
Outcomes
Three-year adjusted HRs: mortality 2.24 (1.51–3.33), hospitalisation 1.29 (1.09–1.54), ADL worsening 1.98 (1.54–2.55); falls interpreted separately.
Time frame
Recruitment cohorts followed for seven and four years; the cited Table 7 estimates concern three years.
Research funding
Multiple NHLBI/NIH Cardiovascular Health Study contracts, detailed in the article.
Research conflicts of interest
The separate competing-interest statement has not been verified.
Reading scope
Original PDF pages M146–M154. The sex-, BMI- and height-specific threshold appendix remains to be checked item by item.
References
Publication record
TAP-RDN-0067 · v1.0 · English
Author: TAP Editorial Team ·
The Allostasis Project is founded and supported by Resilio.
Record for v1.0 · Updated
Editorial responsibility: TAP Editorial Team
Scientific review
Not yet scientifically reviewed
Editorial note
Under the editorial responsibility of the TAP Editorial Team, this publication used AI assistance for content organization and editing. Scientific review is recorded separately on this page.
Download detailed editorial record (JSON) ↓
How responsibilities and review are recorded ↗© The Allostasis Project. All rights reserved. Reproduction or adaptation requires separate permission, subject to applicable legal exceptions.
Download complete edition record (JSON) ↧
Record integrity & available editions
SHA-256: 7ce7c8fc4f84eb147e502b78b9eee819d19172a65f6cc29af277d33db3b8b34a
Captured: 2026-10-29T10:31:13.611Z
- v1.0 · 2026-10-29